Thursday, March 14, 2013

Business School Admissions Blog | MBA Admission ... - mbaMission

mbaMission was happy to be able to speak one-on-one recently with Amanda Carlson, Columbia Business School?s (CBS?s) assistant dean of admissions, about the MBA program?s resources and admissions processes.? She graciously shared some interesting insight on the following topics:

  • What she feels are CBS?s greatest strengths and resources
  • Her department?s recent efforts to add transparency to the admissions process
  • The CBS interview process and the mind-set of the school?s interviewers toward applicants
  • The trend of ever-increasing GMAT scores and the truth behind some common admissions ?myths?
  • What raises red flags for the school?s admissions committee

?

Read on for the full transcript of the conversation.

?

Amanda Carlson, Columbia Business SchoolmbaMission: Amanda, thanks so much for speaking with us?I really appreciate your time. I?d love to start with a question about culture. We recently saw the CBS second-year flash mob video and were struck by what that seemed to show and say about the sense of community at CBS. I heard it took a whole year to plan! Can you give me your take on the intensity of the community at Columbia, and can you describe the culture a little?

Amanda Carlson: The admissions committee was meeting that night shortly after the flash mob had taken place, and one of the students sent a link to a member of our team, so we got to see it that very night! It was really something, and it just really warmed our hearts, and it was a perfect example of how our students really care about giving back to the community.

Our culture embraces people that really want to maximize their opportunities. There are so many different opportunities at Columbia?academic, professional, social and volunteer?and I think our students recognize that our community-driven culture can help open up opportunities that otherwise might not come about.

There?s a lot of comradery among the student population, and it?s very respectful in terms of the students appreciating what each other?s respective priorities are. I think an overarching kind of mind-set is that our students will maximize all opportunities as they come while at the same time being cognizant of giving back to the community and the school.

mbaMission: People typically think finance when they think of Columbia Business School. Would you agree with that? What do you feel CBS should be known for?

AC: What should CBS be known for? We?ve earned a great reputation as a very strong finance school, but we are so much more than just finance. One of the things that people often don?t necessarily recognize is that Columbia puts a tremendous premium on our core curriculum. All of our students receive fundamentals?such as statistics, accounting, marketing, finance?that teach them how to be good stewards and great leaders. This core has evolved in such a way that it is woven throughout the curriculum, and this is a great way for students to learn to connect the dots among all the different classes. It encourages our students to think much more broadly and holistically about the different aspects of each of the classes within the core.

So our brand really does go beyond finance. Columbia certainly has terrific and tremendous finance programs?don?t get me wrong?but at the heart, it?s about creating a pathway that teaches our students how to connect the dots, and that in turn creates great future business leaders.

mbaMission: Great. Aside from the obvious advantage of being located in New York City and so close to Wall Street, what is it about Columbia?s finance program that allows it to stand out so much?

AC: I think it?s about the people that make up our community. When I think about the different types of professors we have here, we?re very blessed to have obviously research faculty but also real-world practitioners who come to campus and teach.

What?s so special about our research faculty is that they?re able to slide seamlessly between their research and practice?consulting for governmental bodies or for different multinational companies?and then they are able to apply that learning, that research, that experience to our students? academic experience in the classroom.

And the practitioners we have are people who may work at boutique investment banks and private equity firms or in asset management as value investors. These people are practitioners by trade, and their real-world experiences make them invaluable to our students. They come here and are able to teach the students exactly what?s going on in real time, as things are happening. And I think that having both types of faculty, that?s a tremendous asset academically as well as professionally for students who are looking for related post-MBA roles.

mbaMission: Beyond finance, can you speak about the hidden gems that Columbia has? Is there a department whose profile you feel needs to come out from the shadows and that Columbia Business School should also be known for?

AC: Where do I start? There are so many little pieces that collectively make up this experience. Well, I just finished my own executive MBA, the EMBA Global Asia program, which is a program that Columbia has that?s run in conjunction with London Business School and the University of Hong Kong. I took most of my electives here, and I think about a class like the retailing leadership class I took with Professor [Mark A.] Cohen. It was extraordinary?Professor Cohen used to be the chairman and CEO of Sears Canada. It was a three-hour class that met on Wednesday afternoons, and for the first 20 or so minutes, we would talk about what?s new and different in the retail industry. So whatever topic was trending in the news?like holiday shopping?would launch the class for about 20 minutes, and then we would transition into a specific retail case. Later we would hear from a CEO or CFO of a major retail company, which once again showed how the lessons learned in the classroom were being implemented in the real world. This past semester, we heard from Michael Gould, who?s the chairman and CEO of Bloomingdales. He?s an alum of Columbia Business School and a member of our Board of Overseers. We also heard from Jerome Chazen, one of the founders of Liz Claiborne. He?s also an alum and a member of our Board of Overseers. We heard from the CEO of Maidenform, the CEO of Gerber Childrenswear, the former CEO of Sears. I mean, it was just extraordinary to be able to hear from so many people who have obviously had tremendous experience in retail and to be able to ask very direct questions in such a small group. I think experiences like these are something we should be known for here at Columbia.

I think the Demming Center [The W. Edwards Deming Center for Quality, Productivity, and Competitiveness] is at the cutting edge of showing how integral ?operations? is in the business space. I took a strategy operations class with Professor Nelson Fraiman?where our class paired up into small consulting groups, and we partnered with entrepreneurs in Latin America that the professors had set us up with. And in addition to the cases we did in class, we had a team of executives from IBM come in and talk to us about all the different opportunities there are to work at IBM, and also what they were doing.

mbaMission: I?ve been in this business a long time, and I feel like I know the schools really well, but I think you opened my eyes to a few new things that will help applicants a lot. That?s great. So, you are the ?new? assistant dean of admissions for CBS, though I put that ?new? in quotes, because I know you?ve been in admissions for more than a few years. Are there any changes in the process that you foresee?

AC: In the application process?

mbaMission: Yes, in the application process going forward. Anything you see changing for CBS? This year, for instance, there has been a slight de-emphasis on essays as word counts have come down, and some schools are trying new group interview techniques. Are you looking to make any big changes to Columbia?s process, or do you think it is fine that way it is?

AC: I feel like what we?re doing has been pretty smooth, and it has served us well. Our admissions team evaluates applications for a number of different programs. We have the August intake, which is the one that has about 550 students in it; we have the January intake, which has about 200 students; and then we have a whole variety of executive MBA programs.

We are evaluating a lot of different applications at one time, so our process needs to be efficient and sound, which fortunately I believe it is, but we are constantly looking to improve. One thing that we?ve worked very hard on this year is trying to give people a much more transparent time frame in terms of when they can expect to get a decision. Within about six weeks or so, they?ll learn whether they?ll have an interview or their application is not going to be moving further in the process. And then after somebody has been interviewed, we?ve told them?and I think we?ve done a pretty good job of sticking with this?that we?ll get them a decision within two weeks after their completed interview report has been submitted.

So we?re trying to make small tweaks in our process to make the whole system be more transparent for applicants and much more, I think, palatable, because the rolling admissions is something that has caused confusion for people at times. We want to make it as easy to understand as possible.

mbaMission: When you yourself evaluate an application, where do you start? Do you go page by page, or just start with the person?s essays or resume? Can you take us through how you would look at a file?

AC: Absolutely. Everyone on our team has their own internal processes as to what we?re most comfortable with and how to get a good sense of the applicant?how to understand who somebody is?but at the end of the day, each application receives the same time and attention and is evaluated using the same measures. One of the things I look at first, certainly, is the resume, so I can get an overarching perspective relatively quickly of where someone has come from since college. Then I try to assess where this applicant wants to go by evaluating their essays. Next, I will look at the letters of recommendation, and then I look at the kind of skeleton details that are provided in the application. So, for example, where does the person live? From where have they come? What is their hometown? What are the specific reasons they?ve had for leaving jobs and making the transitions that they have throughout the course of their career? We can probably make some educated guesses based on a person?s resume, but I look to other parts of the application to kind of fill in the gaps for me. And then the last thing I look at is whether the applicant has gone through the interview process already, and if so, I would then go look at the interview report.

mbaMission: Can you walk us through the entire process? When a file is submitted, what happens next?

AC: That?s a good question. We evaluate all the applications online?no paper, of course. When an application comes in to us, it gets put into an electronic queue and given a time stamp. Then, we have a team that?without getting into too much nitty-gritty detail?will assign members of the admissions committee a number of files per week.

So somebody who?s reading an application can recommend that the applicant be interviewed or denied. If the recommendation is for an interview, then the candidate will be interviewed, and if the recommendation is that somebody is denied admission, the application would go to a second member of the admissions committee before being evaluated before the larger committee.

mbaMission: So let?s say an applicant is denied by the first admissions reader and that person?s application is passed on to a second committee member. If that second committee member also doesn?t want to move the applicant forward, I?m assuming that person is done, right? But what if the second person disagrees and says, ?Let?s interview this person??

AC: Then we?ll interview them. Anytime somebody says they would like to have an applicant interview, they go forward for an interview.

mbaMission: Okay. And so after someone is interviewed, does that person?s application then make its way to your desk? Do you reconvene in a group and evaluate applicants that way?

AC: We meet as a group. If one person says denied, and the second person says denied, it?s basically, ?Okay, then, we agree with that.? If the applicant goes forward to an interview, they would have the interview, and then the committee would convene to evaluate the applicant during the final read.

mbaMission: Right. So, let me switch gears a bit. In the admissions mythology, there is this sense that a ?safe? GMAT score is a 700 total score with an 80th percentile on both sides of the test [Quant and Verbal], but Quant scores in particular have really been going up, meaning the percentile for some previously high scores has dropped. So these days, even a 48 out of a 51, for example, will not be an 80th percentile quant score. Should candidates be worried about the percentiles, or are you looking at their Quant scores in absolute terms? Do you know what I?m saying?

AC: I know exactly what you?re saying, and what I can tell you is a resounding, emphatic ?No.? That is not accurate and not the way we do things. I understand this whole application process is so daunting; it can be so intimidating. I think people should try to relax and not get caught up in some of the noise they may hear from I?m not quite sure what sources. People do not have to have this 80/80 type of a breakdown to be admitted. I can?t be emphatic about that enough.

It?s amazing to me how high so many of these scores are, but it?s something that we take in context with the larger academic aspect of their application?what somebody did as an undergrad or what their undergraduate major may have been and what classes they took, and how did they do. And we also consider it in concert with what they?re doing right now for work. There are a host of factors that go into our evaluation, and our goal is to try to get a holistic view of the person rather than fixate on one score or another.

mbaMission: What would you say is a red flag for you? What would stand out and give you pause when you?re reading a person?s application?

AC: That?s a great question. I think one thing that raises not a red flag but more like a yellow flag is when somebody?s really interested in making a career change?and I know that a lot of people come to business school to make a career change?but there needs to be some consistency in their story. So if, and I?m going to make up an example, if somebody wants to go from working in marketing at a financial services company to working in real estate development, what can they claim that shows demonstrated commitment to this interest in real estate development? I mean, is there volunteer work? Is there academic background? Are there continuing education classes? Is there a membership in some type of professional organization that would show that this is actually coming from some place genuine and it?s not just a pie-in-the-sky idea of what they think they might want to do with their MBA?

So that?s something that we look at very, very closely. There?s so much for our students to do when they are at school, and we want to make sure that they?re realistic in their expectations about what we can facilitate for them, about what the folks in our career management office can assist with. So we really want to ensure that those yellow flags are addressed before we accept somebody into the program.

mbaMission: As you of course know, CBS has its own admissions timetable. Can you discuss the differences between rounds? Should an individual who applies in the regular decision round feel that he has negatively identified himself by not applying early?

AC: Thank you for asking that. Again, I have an emphatic ?No? to the second part of that question.

mbaMission: I think that?s something a lot of candidates worry about, so I appreciate your clarifying that.

AC: Great. And let me be really clear: we receive the bulk of our applications during the regular decision period, and that?s when we admit most of our applicants. We know that people are kind of shopping around, trying to figure out what programs are the best fit, and that?s something really important to do, and that takes time.

So if people are still trying to figure things out and don?t know if Columbia is an ideal fit for them, then they absolutely should apply during the regular decision period. In the early decision period, there are some candidates who know that this is a dream school for them, and I think that applying early decision will serve them well, because they want their decision sooner. They would like to know in August or September that they?re locked down and have the opportunity to come here next year, if Columbia?s where they want to be. And we want to give them that option.

So in terms of the rolling admissions process, basically what it boils down to is that we read applications in the order in which they are submitted, and again, as I referenced earlier, we?re trying to be very transparent with a particular time frame of when candidates will get a decision.

That?s really what the difference is and how our approach works. It?s not: if you submit your application on X date, you?ll get a decision on Y date. It?s: we?ll read the applications in the order in which they?re submitted. You?ll hear something within six weeks, and then however long it takes you to set up your interview and for your interview feedback to be submitted, we?ll get you a decision within two weeks after that. Hopefully, knowing that type of a time frame will make people feel much more comfortable with rolling admissions.

mbaMission: The next question that I have?and you kind of touched on it with your example of the marketing individual who wants to enter real estate development?is about why CBS asks about goals in its essays. So many students change their minds when in school. What?s the benefit of a goal statement?

AC: That?s a great question. I think what so much of that boils down to is that there are 24 hours in a day, and recruiting starts just six weeks after a student steps foot on campus, so recruiters are coming?and again, we have this blessing of our location in New York?and there?s so much to take advantage of, from brown bag lunches to recruiting receptions to different guest speakers. We had more than 450 speakers come to campus last year, and somebody could really have their head spinning in terms of figuring out ?what is it that I want to do?? while at the same time going through the various opportunities available in every 24 hours at Columbia.

You don?t get a second chance to do business school, and we don?t want people to miss this opportunity to really be able to achieve and maximize what they can from their business school experience. So we want people to have a pretty good idea of the path they?d like to pursue. I feel like our students can really be kids in a candy store, given everything at the Office of Student Affairs Career Management. It?s not that they can?t change their minds, but they need to understand that it?s important to have some type of a general focus and to keep their eye on the prize so they can maximize all the abundant resources there are at Columbia.

mbaMission: Let?s shift a little to interviews. Can you start by walking us through a typical admissions interview? What can an applicant expect, and what should applicants do to prepare?

AC: Sure. I always encourage applicants to prepare for a business school interview just like they would for a professional interview, and to put themselves in the shoes of the interviewer. If you were interviewing somebody for your alma mater, what would you want to know? Most of our interviews are conducted by our alumni, and the interviews are blind, so the only thing the interviewer knows about the candidate is what they tell the interviewer.

I also encourage applicants to try to be relaxed and natural. Look, when we do interviews, we?re always rooting for the candidates, and I think our alums bring that perspective as well. It?s their opportunity to talk about Columbia just as it is to learn about what the next generation of Columbia students is going to look like, and we?re always championing people.

So I think the candidates should kind of take a step back and think, ?Okay, if I?m interviewing somebody from my alma mater, am I going into it thinking I really want to like this person or I really don?t want to like this person?? Of course you?re going to want to like the person. So that really should put people at ease when they?re meeting with us. But all that said, you should still prepare as you would for a professional interview. Reread your application. The admissions committee is of course going to look for consistency in your story. It should not come as a surprise to anybody that if a person who?s interviewing says, ?Well, I?d like to go into health care? to the interviewer but said, ?I want to go into real estate development? in their application, that?s clearly going to be something that gets our minds percolating.

mbaMission: How often does that happen?

AC: You?d be surprised. Of course, I?m making up an extreme example, but inconsistencies happen more than you might think.

mbaMission: What should someone expect during a Columbia interview itself?

AC: We don?t give the interviewers a script per se. They?ve got some general guidelines as to what they should be asking, but there is nothing that should take a candidate by surprise. Think about goals. Think about fit. Think about larger business issues. Think about community. When I meet with people, I always think to myself and will even sometimes be forthcoming and just say, ?Look, I?m not trying to trick you or trap you. We?re just trying to get to know you a little bit better.? And I think the more relaxed and natural people can be, the better they?re going to do.

mbaMission: Right. And interviews are typically about a half hour long?

AC: They can last anywhere from half an hour to an hour. A few weeks ago, I went down to Washington, DC, because we had a large number of applicants who needed to be interviewed. Some were 30 minutes and others 60 minutes. One thing I?ll say is that the length of your interview in no way hints at your chances of admittance. I?ve had 30-minute interviews where people were admitted and 60-minute interviews where they weren?t. The reverse of both of these is certainly true as well.

mbaMission: And so you occasionally jump in if there?s too much demand, or do you look at someone?s file and say, ?Wow, that?s an interesting person. I?d like to talk to that person??

AC: No I don?t cherry pick interviews. If there?s a need due to high demand, geographical constraints or other circumstances, then I?ll jump in. Or if we have to Skype interview somebody?that?s when the admissions committee would actually do the interviews.

mbaMission: And when do you use Skype to interview people? Is it just when they?re just so remote?

AC: Yes. Perhaps somebody is a part of the military and deployed abroad, or they?re off doing something in a distant location?that would generally be when we use Skype. It?s certainly not ideal, that?s not what we strive for, but if we need to do it that way, we?re able to.

mbaMission: Right. And why do you primarily use alumni to conduct your interviews?

AC: The alumni bring an invaluable perspective to interviewing prospective students. And we of course love to keep our alumni engaged. We love to hear their perspective, and it?s really heartwarming when we hear from the alumni that they?ve really connected with somebody so much so that they?d even like to give a candidate a job offer or an internship over the summer while they?re here. I also think it?s beneficial for the candidates to be able to hear from somebody who?s gone through the program. They can ask them all the nitty-gritty questions that perhaps a member of the admissions committee who hasn?t gone through the program wouldn?t be able to answer quite as well.

mbaMission: Let me ask just one more question on interviews. What if an interview just doesn?t go well? Let?s say I am a candidate, and I have just a disastrous experience?I don?t know, my alumnus woke up on the wrong side of the bed and was totally disengaged and I could tell, or even I woke up on the wrong side of the bed, and I?m generally a great interviewer, but I just floundered for some reason. Is there anything I can do, or is that just life?

AC: We are always open to hearing that feedback. We may not always be able to accommodate somebody with a second interview, but it is not unheard of that if somebody gives us that feedback, we might bring them in to meet with us or match them up with a second interviewer. That?s not unheard of, but we wouldn?t guarantee that for everyone.

mbaMission: Right. The vast majority of alumni are great, of course, but when you?re dealing with such a large and diverse group, every once in a while, someone just misses.

AC: Sure. The way I look at it?and I mean this from the bottom of my heart?is that when we bring people in, we really really want to like them, so we want to do everything we can to give them every shot to put their best foot forward.

mbaMission: Definitely. So many people perceive the admissions committee as being so negative and punitive, like they?re just sitting there waiting to reject people, and it?s really not like that at all.

AC: No. Not at all. We wouldn?t be in this business if we were like that!

mbaMission: That?s a great way of ending this interview?on that note. Thank you so much for this.

AC: Sure?thank you!

Source: http://www.mbamission.com/blog/2013/03/12/mbamissions-exclusive-interview-with-amanda-carlson-assistant-dean-of-admissions-at-columbia-business-school/

Colorado Springs pga tour Nora Ephron mario balotelli mario balotelli espn3 kevin youkilis

Rains or Not, India Is Falling Short on Drinkable Water

[unable to retrieve full-text content]That people in one of the rainiest places on the planet struggle to get potable water is emblematic of the profound water challenges that India faces.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/world/asia/rains-or-not-india-is-falling-short-on-drinkable-water.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Freeh Report direct tv wimbledon ray allen Savages Home Run Derby 2012 San Diego fireworks

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Turkish bonds, lira flat after debt auction; Turkcell up

ISTANBUL, March 12 (Reuters) - Turkish bond yields and lira

steadied on Tuesday after a debt auction that produced a yield

close to expectations.

In the stock market, Turkcell rose on the appointment of

independent board members.

By 1517 GMT, the lira was at 1.8025 to the dollar

, virtually unchanged from 1.8020 late on Monday.

Against its euro-dollar basket it weakened to

2.0770, from 2.0724.

Turkey's treasury issued a 15-month zero-coupon bond at an

average compound yield of 5.71 percent, close to a Reuters

forecast of 5.67 percent.

The yield on the two-year benchmark bond

closed at 5.81 percent, only one tick away from Monday's close

at 5.82 percent.

Istanbul's main share index closed up 0.27 percent

at 83,347.54 points, slightly outperforming a fall of 0.5

percent in the global emerging markets index.

Shares in Turkcell closed up 3.03 percent after

the state Capital Markets Board appointed three independent

board members. A long-running share dispute has prevented the

mobile phone company's board from meeting or distributing

dividends for two years.

(Writing by Seltem Iyigun; Editing by Ruth Pitchford)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/turkish-bonds-lira-flat-debt-auction-turkcell-155347444--sector.html

project x the lorax lorax fisker karma super tuesday states shepard fairey is snooki pregnant

Thursday, February 28, 2013

89% Django Unchained

All Critics (228) | Top Critics (41) | Fresh (202) | Rotten (26)

Django Unchained is Tarantino's most complete movie yet. It is also his most vital. His storytelling talents match the heft of the tale.

Django Unchained has mislaid its melancholy, and its bitter wit, and become a raucous romp. It is a tribute to the spaghetti Western, cooked al dente, then cooked a while more, and finally sauced to death.

Genre-movie-mad writer-director Quentin Tarantino's foray into Western World is a pretty grave disappointment.

Wildly extravagant, ferociously violent, ludicrously lurid and outrageously entertaining, yet also, remarkably, very much about the pernicious lunacy of racism and, yes, slavery's singular horrors.

Quentin Tarantino no longer makes movies; he makes trailers.

Django Unchained is the most brutal film Quentin Tarantino has ever made.But the movie is also exciting and ironic and, at times, explosively funny: Even at his most serious, Tarantino can't help but entertain and show you a good time.

Tarantino is, in essence, a classicist who invests the bulk of his drama and tension in lengthy dialogue exchanges that are infinitely more compelling that his elongated sequences of cathartic violence.

Still wonderfully witty and violent sequences that only Tarantino could manage or dare.

This bloody, hilarious, shocking, and righteously angry film is the kind of great art and great trash [Tarantino] aspires to make.

...compulsively watchable for the majority of its (admittedly overlong) running time...

I had a good enough time to wish that it had been better.

Part-blaxploitation film, part-spaghetti Western and all-Tarantino, 'Django Unchained' comes charging at its audiences with guns a-blazin'. It's not quite up to par with 'Reservoir Dogs' or 'Pulp Fiction,' but it's still Tarantino - enough said.

Overlong, overblown and overly self-indulgent. But excess is what Tarantino does. And just as he won't put one word in his characters' mouths when he can have them utter 10; he won't dispatch a bad guy with one bullet when he can discharge a dozen.

It would seem that this film's irreverence isn't a case of didn't-try-can't-fail dismissiveness, but rather something more innocuous: it's simply the world interpreted through Tarantino's boisterous perspective.

The funniest western since Blazing Saddles, the bloodiest since The Wild Bunch and the most visually stylish since The Good, The Bad & The Ugly.

Guilty of almost every indulgence [Tarantino] has ever been accused of...but it's hard to hold it against him, when the results are this bloody good

Ultimately enjoyable, if a little underwhelming, if nothing else we can be grateful to Django Unchained for allowing the phrase "that's the worst thing since Quentin Tarantino's Australian accent".

Impolitic though it might be to suggest it, there's something extremely satisfying about the violence here-though, for my money, it resides less in seeing these racist thugs get their comeuppance, than in the director's staging of it.

it's fitting that one of the greatest American filmmakers of all time is using the western and blaxploitation genres to connect the enduring blemish on the American psyche - only to set loose a bad motherf*cker to set it right.

Thrilling, stylish, funny, brutal, superbly-acted, sharply written and wonderfully offensive.

Django Unchained is a joy. It's fun and foolish, unhinged and unapologetic.

Possibly Tarantino's most thoughtful and even political film to date.

Tarantino is starting to look more and more like an angry teenager in his bedroom going, "Wouldn't it be good if..."

Whereas there was savage beauty and irony in the '60-'70s violence of Penn, Peckinpah, and Leone, the coda of 'Django Unchained' is mere benumbing splatter.

It's a big, crazy, hugely entertaining, multilayered piece of filmmaking - a fierce but fiercely intelligent testament to Tarantino's frequently questioned filmmaking proclivities and certainly among the best films he's made.

Trazendo alguns dos melhores momentos da filmografia de Tarantino, ainda culmina em um cl?max longo e violento que certamente levar? os f?s do diretor a orgasmos de sangue.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/django_unchained_2012/

Olympics Live

Friday, February 22, 2013

Oscar Pistorius bail hearing nearing decision

Photographers take photos of Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius as he stands in the dock during his bail hearing at the magistrates court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, Feb. 22, 2013. The fourth and likely final day of Oscar Pistorius' bail hearing opened on Friday, with the magistrate then to rule if the double-amputee athlete can be freed before trial or if he has to remain in custody over the shooting death of his girlfriend. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

Photographers take photos of Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius as he stands in the dock during his bail hearing at the magistrates court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, Feb. 22, 2013. The fourth and likely final day of Oscar Pistorius' bail hearing opened on Friday, with the magistrate then to rule if the double-amputee athlete can be freed before trial or if he has to remain in custody over the shooting death of his girlfriend. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius stands in the dock during his bail hearing at the magistrate court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, Feb. 22, 2013. The fourth and likely final day of Oscar Pistorius' bail hearing opened on Friday, with the magistrate then to rule if the double-amputee athlete can be freed before trial or if he has to remain in custody over the shooting death of his girlfriend. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius' father Henke Pistorius, right, with his children Carl, center,, and Aimee, left, watch as Oscar Pistorius walks in during his bail hearing at the magistrate court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, Feb. 22, 2013. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

Graphic shows the layout of Oscar Pistorius??? apartment

Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius stands in the dock during his bail hearing at the magistrates court in Pretoria, South Africa, Friday, Feb. 22, 2013. The fourth and likely final day of Oscar Pistorius' bail hearing opened on Friday, with the magistrate then to rule if the double-amputee athlete can be freed before trial or if he has to remain in custody over the shooting death of his girlfriend. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

PRETORIA, South Africa (AP) ? The defense and prosecution both completed their arguments Friday in Oscar Pistorius' bail hearing, with the magistrate soon to rule if the double-amputee athlete can be freed or if he must stay behind bars pending trial in the shooting death of his girlfriend.

The prosecution vehemently opposed bail to Chief Magistrate Desmond Nair in a case that has transfixed South Africans and brought international media attention to the nation's justice system and police capabilities.

Pistorius is charged with one count of premeditated murder in the Feb. 14 killing of Reeva Steenkamp. He says he accidentally shot her, thinking she was a dangerous intruder inside his home, lurking in a toilet stall off his bedroom.

Pistorius' hands trembled as he said "good morning, your worship" as the session began in Magistrate's Court in Pretoria, South Africa's capital. For the first time in the hearing, two representatives of the Steenkamp family were present in court, sitting behind and to the left of Pistorius in the public gallery.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel called Pistorius' version that he shot Steenkamp accidentally improbable and argued that Pistorius did not have to have planned the killing for days in advance for it to be premediated.

"He planned it that night when she (Steenkamp) locked herself in (the toilet)," Nel said in response to a question from the magistrate on why Pistorius hadn't staged a break-in at his home to make his story look more believable. "The fact that we have only one survivor of that tragic night is difficult for the state."

Pistorius' defense lawyer, Barry Roux, brought up culpable homicide as a possible charge for the first time in the case when answering questions from the magistrate.

"He did not want to kill Reeva. He had no intent to kill Reeva," Roux said as Pistorius began weeping again ? like he has done for much of his bail hearing.

Roux said it was impossible for Pistorius, as famous as he is and with his prostheses, to escape South Africa before trial and bail should be granted.

"Let me tell you how difficult it is for this man to disappear from this world," Roux said.

Prosecutor Nel earlier countered that everyone, whether disabled or famous or otherwise different from the majority, should be treated equally under the law. Nel noted that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is famous but is now holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden to face sex-related charges.

Nair, the magistrate, will decide if Pistorius can be freed with conditions or if he is held until trial. Pistorius faces the sternest bail conditions in South Africa because of the seriousness of the murder charge, meaning his defense lawyers have to prove there is an "exceptional" reason for him to be freed.

Stephen Tuson, an adjunct law professor at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and a practicing attorney, told The Associated Press that poor health, a weak state case or a disability could be reasons to grant bail to a person accused of murder. But the "exceptional" circumstances Pistorius would have to prove to be freed are not established absolutely by law and are applied considering the individual merits of each case.

"(The matter of exceptional reasons) is not defined," Tuson said. "We've had to have this concept expanded by the courts on a case by case basis."

Pistorius' defense has dedicated much of its argument in the bail hearing to questioning the state's case against Pistorius and trying to discredit the police investigation into Steenkamp's shooting. Lead investigator Hilton Botha was removed from the case Thursday following his bungled testimony for the prosecution and replaced by the South African police's top detective, Vinesh Moonoo ? who was in court Friday.

Defense lawyer Roux also stressed Pistorius' disability Friday and said it was one of the reasons why he couldn't easily flee the country.

"He cannot, cannot go unnoticed through airport security. When he goes through the security at the airport, there's every time a commotion because the system would react," Roux said. He added that Pistorius also needs medical treatment for his stumps and has to have his prostheses adjusted on a monthly basis.

In arguing against bail, Nel sought to portray Pistorius as a spoiled celebrity with an inflated sense of self who believed he was above the law. Nel also said selfishness could be driving expressions of remorse by suspects such as Pistorius.

"All that I feel sorry for is myself," Nel said of Pistorius. "I've shot her and my career is done."

Pistorius' longtime coach Ampie Louw had said before proceedings began that he is considering putting his runner back in training if he is granted bail to allow him to "get his mind kind of clear."

Louw said he realizes that the Olympic athlete might not be emotionally ready to give any thought to running.

"The change is that he is heartbroken, that is all," Louw said in the courtroom, surrounded by reporters and television cameras. "For me it is tough to see that. Not to be able to reach out and sit next to him and say 'Sorry, man, it was a terrible accident.' But I cannot do it, I must just sit here in court and that's all.

"The sooner he can start working the better," said Louw, who was the person who convinced the double amputee to take up track as a teenager a decade ago.

He has been held at a police station in Pretoria since last week, but suspects who are denied bail are typically held in a prison.

Roux argued on Thursday that the evidence backs Pistorius' statement that he shot through a toilet door at his home because he mistook Steenkamp for an intruder, killing her by accident.

"I think there will be a level of shock in this country if he is not released (on bail)," Roux said in court.

Opposing bail, Nel argued that Pistorius was too willing to shoot. The prosecution says Pistorius planned to kill his 29-year-old girlfriend, a model and budding reality TV star, after an argument in the early hours of Valentine's Day.

"The reason you fire four shots is to kill," Nel said.

Louw said he might put Pistorius ? who overcame the amputation of his lower legs as a baby to compete at last year's London Olympics ? back on a morning and afternoon training routine if he is freed, believing it might help him to be able to run track again.

"You must give him space," the coach said.

___

AP Sports Writer Gerald Imray contributed to this report from Johannesburg.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-02-22-Pistorius-Shooting/id-db4f7be0f4754aeba3a1dd5dbb4b24b1

Pink Floyd 12 12 12 Concert miley cyrus miley cyrus amazing race Cam Cameron Ada Lovelace

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

NBA Director Says Lil Wayne Is Not Banned From NBA Events

NBA Director Says Lil Wayne Is Not Banned From NBA Events
Posted by Jeremy Thomas?on 02.19.2013

He says it isn't true...

Despite Lil Wayne's claims, he is not banned from all NBA events. Mark Broussard, who is the senior director of basketball communications at the NBA, told TMZ that there is "no truth at all" to Wayne's claims that he was is banned from all events because of his problems with the Miami Heat after he was kicked out of a game for rooting for the LA Lakers.

Wayne made the claim during a concert in Houston over the weekend.

comments powered by

Source: http://www.411mania.com/music/news/274136

paulina gretzky paulina gretzky david bowie elvis presley elvis presley Pretty Little Liars Rob Parker

London Fashion Week 2013: Cara Delevingne's top Autumn/Winter catwalk looks

With her bubbly personality and strikingly good-looks, it's no surprise that the model is in high demand and every pop star wants to be her friend.

But as fashion week draws to a close for another season, we take a look back at Cara's best looks on the catwalk.

Kicking off day four of LFW, the 20-year-old strutted her stuff down the catwalk for Peter Pilloto.?

In a mix of bold and unusual prints, the Britsh model wore a geometric monochrome dress with a signature splash of yellow mustard.

ABOVE: Cara creates a more feminine look as she walks the catwalk for Matthew Williamson

Her second look demonstrated the season change as Cara wore a similar patterned outfit with a striking fur collar.

Two thumbs-up for the awesome prints Peter.

Next up was the catwalk for Matthew Williamson in a more casual-chic look.?

Starting in an over-sized aqua lace print top and pleated mustard skirt, we can't imagine Cara rocking a night out with Rihanna in this look.

ABOVE: The 20-year-old takes on a more edgy look for Topshop Unique

She later however, heated things up in a metallic silver pencil skirt which is definitely a look everyone will be trying to rock this season.

Topshop Unique's autumn/winter collection was more fun and edgy compared to the other looks as Cara worked her magic with these cool designs.

Her looks included a glitzy sequin two-piece and wet look skirt - very hot.

Cara also took to the catwalk for fashion designer Issa where the hot model couldn't have looked more sophisticated.

In a flowing feminine maxi and wide-brimmed hat, we're sure designer fan Kate Middleton would have loved the collection.

So with more then enough catwalks under her belt, we think it's fair to say that Cara is the face of LFW.

ABOVE: Cara walks for Kate Middleton's favourite designer Issa
Agree? Let us know on Twitter along with your favourite catwalk designs.

Source: http://uk.ok.feedsportal.com/c/33339/f/586181/s/28b2497c/l/0L0Sok0O0Ccelebrity0Enews0Cview0C595730CLondon0EFashion0EWeek0E20A130ECara0EDelevingne0Es0Etop0EAutumn0EWinter0Ecatwalk0Elooks0C/story01.htm

kyla pratt justified season 3 custer scott walker restaurant week type 2 diabetes occupy congress